<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:17:57 +0000 (GMT)
From   : info@... (Sprow)
Subject: Basic6809 1.00

In article <4AF5C3E6.5030807@...>,
   Rick Murray <rick@...> wrote:
> Rick Murray wrote:
>
> > Whatever. BeebASM. OMG! Wow!
>
> Interesting choice to make SAVE's end address to be the one AFTER the 
> byte to end with; thus retaining 'compatibility' with what was probably 
> a bug in the MOS [I believe RISC OS's *Save end is the actual end].

 *SAVE test 1000 1010 -> saves 16 bytes on both RISC OS or BBC Micro

they're both consistent,
Sprow.
<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>